Discuss the techniques adopted by NGO's in Problem analysis

     MSW Notes > NGO Management 

14) Discuss the techniques adopted by NGO's in Problem analysis.

Answer:

Techniques Adopted by NGOs in Problem Analysis

Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) play a crucial role in identifying, analyzing, and addressing social problems. Their interventions are not only service-oriented but also research-based, with a clear understanding of the social, cultural, and economic realities of communities. Problem analysis is the foundation of their planning and programming, as it allows them to understand the root causes, dynamics, and consequences of a problem before designing suitable interventions. NGOs employ multiple techniques to analyze problems, ensuring that the voices of the affected communities are integrated into the process.

Understanding Problem Analysis in Social Work

Problem analysis is a systematic approach to identifying the issues faced by individuals, families, or communities and breaking them down into manageable components. It goes beyond the mere identification of visible symptoms and seeks to uncover the structural, cultural, and institutional factors that perpetuate the problem. For NGOs, especially those working in development and welfare, this process is indispensable because it prevents superficial solutions and ensures that resources are directed toward long-term change.

For example, if an NGO is addressing child malnutrition, it does not merely focus on providing supplementary nutrition but tries to analyze why malnutrition persists—whether due to poverty, lack of awareness, cultural practices, or gaps in public health services.

Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and Participatory Learning and Action (PLA)

One of the most popular approaches adopted by NGOs is participatory rural appraisal (PRA), also known as participatory learning and action (PLA). This technique involves the community in the process of identifying and analyzing their problems. PRA relies on tools such as social mapping, resource mapping, time lines, seasonal calendars, and Venn diagrams to enable communities to articulate their own realities.

For instance, an NGO working in a drought-prone area may use PRA to draw seasonal calendars with villagers. The villagers may indicate how agricultural yield declines during certain months, how migration increases, and how children drop out of school in those periods. This analysis not only reveals the immediate problem of water scarcity but also its ripple effects on education and livelihood. Such participatory techniques empower communities by making them part of the problem-solving process rather than passive recipients of aid.

Needs Assessment Surveys

Another widely used technique is the needs assessment survey. NGOs often design structured or semi-structured surveys to collect data about the conditions of a community. These surveys focus on identifying both felt needs (those that communities express directly) and unfelt needs (those that may not be immediately recognized by the community but are observed through professional assessment).

For example, in urban slums, families may highlight the need for better sanitation facilities, which is a felt need. At the same time, the survey may reveal high levels of domestic violence or substance abuse, which may not be openly discussed by residents but represent unfelt needs requiring attention. By conducting surveys, NGOs are able to prioritize issues, categorize problems, and design interventions based on evidence rather than assumptions.

Problem Tree Analysis

Problem tree analysis is another structured method used by NGOs to identify causes and effects of a problem. In this method, the central problem is placed at the trunk of a tree, the roots represent the underlying causes, and the branches represent the effects or consequences.

Consider the issue of child labor. The “trunk” is the problem of children working instead of going to school. The “roots” may include poverty, lack of educational infrastructure, parental illiteracy, and weak enforcement of labor laws. The “branches” may include illiteracy among children, exploitation, and continuation of the poverty cycle. Through this analysis, NGOs can decide whether their intervention should focus on poverty alleviation, educational access, or policy advocacy.

This technique is particularly useful because it shows the interconnectedness of social problems and prevents oversimplification.

Stakeholder Analysis

NGOs also adopt stakeholder analysis to understand the different actors involved in a problem, their interests, power, and influence. Stakeholder analysis helps NGOs to identify potential partners, opponents, and beneficiaries. It also clarifies the relationships between government agencies, local leaders, community groups, and external donors.

For example, an NGO working on environmental conservation may map out stakeholders such as local farmers, forest officials, industrial units, and community leaders. Farmers may depend on forest resources, industries may contribute to pollution, and government officials may be responsible for enforcing regulations. By analyzing stakeholders, NGOs can anticipate conflicts, build alliances, and design strategies that are politically and socially feasible.

Case Studies and Life Histories

To deeply understand social problems, NGOs often use qualitative methods such as case studies and life histories. These techniques provide insights into how individuals experience problems in their daily lives, and they highlight the human dimension often missed in statistical data.

For instance, an NGO working with women survivors of domestic violence may document life histories to understand how patriarchal structures, economic dependency, and lack of legal awareness interact to perpetuate abuse. These narratives are not only useful for problem analysis but also serve as advocacy tools to influence policymakers and raise awareness among the public.

Focus Group Discussions (FGDs)

Focus group discussions are commonly employed to explore perceptions, attitudes, and experiences related to a problem. NGOs invite small groups of community members to share their opinions in a guided discussion facilitated by a moderator. FGDs are especially useful for understanding sensitive issues such as gender discrimination, HIV/AIDS stigma, or caste-based exclusion.

For example, in a project aimed at preventing early marriages, an NGO may conduct separate FGDs with adolescent girls, parents, and community leaders. Each group may provide different perspectives—girls may talk about their lack of choice, parents may speak about economic pressures, and leaders may discuss cultural traditions. Analyzing these perspectives helps NGOs to design interventions that are culturally sensitive yet progressive.

SWOT Analysis

Some NGOs use organizational tools such as SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) to analyze social problems in relation to community capacities and external conditions. This technique helps NGOs understand not only the challenges but also the resources and strengths that communities possess.

For example, in analyzing the problem of unemployment among youth, NGOs may identify strengths such as a high literacy rate and access to vocational training institutes. Weaknesses may include lack of entrepreneurial culture, opportunities may include government skill development programs, and threats may include competition from outside labor markets. By using SWOT analysis, NGOs can align their interventions with existing opportunities and minimize risks.

Triangulation and Multi-Method Approaches

Problem analysis in complex social contexts cannot rely on a single technique. NGOs often combine methods, a practice called triangulation. For example, they may begin with PRA exercises, conduct surveys for quantitative validation, hold FGDs for deeper insights, and review secondary data from government reports. Triangulation ensures that the problem is analyzed from multiple perspectives and that findings are reliable.

 

Illustration: Problem Analysis in a Water and Sanitation Project

To illustrate how NGOs combine these techniques, let us consider an NGO working in rural Andhra Pradesh on water and sanitation issues. The NGO starts with PRA, where community members map out existing water sources and sanitation facilities. This reveals that women walk several kilometers for water. Then, needs assessment surveys show that water-borne diseases are common. FGDs with women highlight the burden of water collection, while case studies of affected families show the economic cost of illness. Problem tree analysis further identifies causes such as lack of borewells, poor maintenance of existing infrastructure, and government neglect. Stakeholder analysis reveals that local Panchayat leaders, health workers, and women’s self-help groups are crucial actors. By synthesizing these methods, the NGO designs a project that includes installing borewells, capacity building for maintenance, and community awareness programs.

Conclusion

The techniques adopted by NGOs in problem analysis reflect both scientific rigor and participatory values. Whether through PRA, surveys, problem trees, or stakeholder mapping, NGOs ensure that they go beyond superficial symptoms to uncover root causes and systemic linkages. These techniques not only guide program design but also foster community ownership, empowerment, and sustainability. For students of social work, understanding these methods is vital, as they represent the practical application of social work principles in real-world development practice. By systematically analyzing problems, NGOs are able to create interventions that are context-specific, evidence-based, and transformative.